The Influence of Memory Load, Speech-to-Noise Ratio, and Stimulus Rehearsal on the Pupil Dilation Response: Implications for the Assessment of Listening Effort

View at publisher
Authors: Adriana A. Zekveld, Veerle W. Visser, Sophia E. Kramer, Jorn Sangers, Cas Smits
Cited by: 1
References: 59

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pupillometry has been frequently used to examine the influence of auditory task demand on listening effort. However, the intelligibility effect on the pupil dilation response might be altered under high memory load. METHOD: = 22 years, 16 women). Sequences of four or six digits were presented in stationary noise at two auditory demand levels. For either 20% or 80% of the trials, digits were rehearsed. Participants rated listening effort, task difficulty, performance, and tendency to give up. RESULTS: Linear mixed-model analyses indicated that intelligibility was higher for four digits compared to six digits and for lower auditory demand compared to higher auditory demand. The mean pupil dilation was larger for lower auditory demand during listening. In the repetition interval, the peak and mean pupil dilations were larger for lower auditory demand compared to higher auditory demand, for six digits compared to four digits, and for 80% compared to 20% stimulus rehearsal. Subjective listening effort and task difficulty were higher for higher auditory demand than for lower auditory demand and for six digits than for four digits. A lower auditory demand also resulted in higher performance ratings and lower tendency to give up compared to higher auditory demand. CONCLUSIONS: The established decrease in the pupil dilation response with decreasing auditory demand (higher SNR) can be altered in tasks with relatively high memory demands. It is important to consider the memory demands imposed by the listening task when assessing the pupil dilation response. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31974978.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation Neuroscience and Music Perception Hearing Cochlea Tinnitus Genetics

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
2339–2354
Publication date
16 April 2026
Language
EN