Euclid preparation

Read full text
Authors: S Vinciguerra, Filippo Bouchè, N. Martinet, Lina Castiblanco, Cora Uhlemann, S Pires, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, C. Giocoli, M Baldi, V.F Cardone, Antonio Pasquale Vadala, N. Dagoneau
+88 more Laila Linke, Elena Sellentin, Peter L. Taylor, Jeger C. Broxterman, S. Heydenreich, Vilasini Tinnaneri Sreekanth, Natàlia Porqueres, Lucas Porth, M. Gatti, Daniela Grandón, Alexandre Barthelemy, F Bernardeau, Andreas Tersenov, Henk Hoekstra, Jean‐Luc Starck, S. Cheng, P.A Burger, Ismael Tereno, R. Scaramella, B Altieri, S Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, S. Bardelli, A. Biviano, E Branchini, M. Brescia, S. Camera, G Cañas-Herrera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, G Castignani, S. Cavuoti, K. C. Chambers, A. Cimatti, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, L Conversi, Y. Copin, F. Courbin, H. M. Courtois, Mark S. Cropper, A. Da Silva, H Degaudenzi, S. de la Torre, G de Lucia, Herve A. Dole, F. Dubath, X. Dupac, S Dusini, S. Escoffier, Maria Farina, R Farinelli, S. Farrens, F Faustini, S Ferriol, Fabio Finelli, M. Frailis, Enrico Franceschi, M. Fumana, S. Galeotta, Koshy George, Bryan R. Gillis, J. Gracia-Carpio, A Grazian, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, W. A. Holmes, F. Hormuth, Allan Hornstrup, Patrick Hudelot, K. Jahnkę, Murzy D. Jhabvala, Benjamin Joachimi, Elina Keihänen, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, M. Kilbinger, Bogna Kubik, Martin Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, A. M. C. Le Brun, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, V. Lindholm, I Lloro
Cited by: 1
References: 119

Abstract

This is the second paper in the HOWLS (higher-order weak lensing statistics) series exploring the usage of non-Gaussian statistics for cosmology inference within Euclid . With respect to our first paper, we develop a full tomographic analysis based on realistic photometric redshifts that allows us to derive Fisher forecasts in the ( σ 8 , w 0 ) plane for a Euclid -like data release 1 (DR1) setup. We find that the five higher-order statistics (HOS) that satisfy the Gaussian likelihood assumption of the Fisher formalism (one-point probability distribution function, ℓ 1-norm, peak counts, Minkowski functionals, and Betti numbers) each outperform the shear two-point correlation functions by a factor of 2.5 on the w 0 forecasts, with only marginal improvement when used in combination with two-point estimators, suggesting that every HOS is able to retrieve both the non-Gaussian and Gaussian information of the matter density field. The similar performance of the different estimators is explained by a homogeneous use of multi-scale and tomographic information, optimized to lower computational costs. These results hold for the three mass mapping techniques of the Euclid pipeline, aperture mass, Kaiser–Squires, and Kaiser–Squires plus, and they are unaffected by the application of realistic star masks. Finally, we explored the use of HOS with the Bernardeau–Nishimichi–Taruya (BNT) nulling scheme approach, finding promising results toward applying physical scale cuts to HOS.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Galaxies: Formation Evolution Phenomena Cosmology and Gravitation Theories Statistical Mechanics and Entropy

Publication details

Journal / source
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Volume
707
Pages
A235–A235
Publication date
6 January 2026
Language
EN