Homeopathy as a Personalised Adjuvant Approach in Treating Major Depressive Disorder: An N-of-1 Study and Physicochemical Analysis of Homeopathic Preparations

View at publisher
Authors: Ubiratan Cardinalli Adler, Maristela Schiabel Adler, Renan dos Santos Nogueira, Márcio Normando Borges Coelho Filho, Eugênio de Moura Campos, Patrícia Andréa da Fonseca Magalhães, Antonio Brazil Viana Júnior, Anderson Carneiro Costa, Raelle F. Gomes, Regina Celia Monteiro de Paula, Rosemayre Souza Freire, Francisco Luan Fonsêca da Silva
+3 more Eduardo Mello Barroso Filho, Caren Nádia Soares de Sousa, Lia Lira Olivier Sanders
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is difficult to treat pharmacologically, highlighting the need for personalised approaches like homeopathy. This study examines the efficacy and safety of a standardised homeopathy protocol for MDD through N-of-1 trials. Findings from the first participant are reported, along with an analysis of the medications used. Methods: A 28-week crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trial was conducted. The participant, diagnosed with a major depressive episode, showed a 50% reduction in baseline depressive symptoms during homeopathic treatment ( Sulphur LM2 and LM3). Three treatment blocks were completed, each with masked periods ( Sulphur LM4–7 or placebo) lasting 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were depressive symptom progression, assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II). Secondary outcomes included clinical global impression severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) scores and the mental (MCS-12) and physical (PCS-12) components of the SF-12 health survey. Adverse events were monitored. The composition of Sulphur LM2–7 was analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: Linear regression showed a significant increase in BDI-II scores during placebo periods, but not with homeopathic treatment. MCS-12 scores decreased during placebo, in-line with the BDI-II findings. No significant trends appeared in PCS-12 scores. CGI-S scores improved from “markedly ill” to “borderline mentally ill” during the run-in period and remained stable. CGI-I scores improved to “very much improved” and remained unchanged throughout the trial. SEM identified nanoparticles in Sulphur LM4, while DLS and ICP-MS confirmed nanomaterials in Sulphur LM2–7. Conclusion: Preliminary findings suggest the homeopathic protocol is more effective than placebo in treating MDD. Homeopathy may be considered a form of personalised nanomedicine.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects Treatment of Major Depression

Publication details

Journal / source
Homeopathy
Volume
115
Publication date
1 February 2026