Automatic Evaluation of Small Bowel Cleanliness in Capsule Endoscopy: A Comparative Study of Four Preparations using Artificial Intelligence

Read full text
Authors: Andrea Nevárez, Reinier Noorda, Noelia Alonso-Lázaro, Cristina Carretero, César Prieto de Frías, Begoña González-Suárez, Antonio Giordano, VA Jiménez-García, Laura Lorenzo González, Angel Caunedo-Álvarez, Julio Valle Muñoz, Almudena García Vela
+14 more Marisol Luján-Sanchís, Lucía Ruíz Sánchez, Francisco Sánchez Ceballos, Juan Luis Mendoza Hernández, J García Lledó, Oscar Nogales Rincón, J. Egea Valenzuela, María José Mesa López, Ainara Merino Zubizarreta, Pamela Estévez Boullosa, Alfonso Martínez-Turnes, Marco Bustamante, Valery Naranjo, Vicente Pons Beltrán
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

Abstract Background Diagnostic yield (DY) of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is limited by the presence of intestinal content. An objective assessment of the cleanliness grade of the small bowel (SB) is currently lacking. We developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assess SB cleanliness in a multicenter observational study comparing four types of bowel preparations. Objectives Identify the best preparation for SBCE applying a system based on convolutional neural networks that assess the SB degree of cleanliness. Design We included 372 SBCE consecutive procedures with four different bowel preparations. Group A (n = 93): liquid diet (LD), Group B (n = 92): macrogol 3350 + ascorbic acid 1000 mL, Group C (n = 94): sodium picosulfate, and Group D (n = 93): macrogol 500 mL. The degree of cleanliness of the SB was evaluated with the automatic tool (0–100%). Gastric and SB transit times, DY, and degree of satisfaction with the preparation were also evaluated. Results Mean age of included patients was 58.14 years (confidence interval 95% 18–93 years); 55.9% were women. There were no significant differences in the degree of cleanliness of the SB evaluated with AI between groups (Mean Group A: 51.28%; B: 54.79%; C: 52.44%; D: 55.34%; p=0.415), nor in transit times or DY. LD was the best-tolerated preparation. Multivariable analysis identified age and diabetes as independent predictors of lower cleanliness. Conclusion We demonstrated using an AI-based tool, that LD provides adequate preparation for SBCE, questioning the routine administration of laxatives and supporting a patient-centered approach.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment Gastrointestinal motility and disorders

Publication details

Journal / source
Endoscopy International Open
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Volume
14
Issue
CP
Pages
a28974847–a28974847
Publication date
3 July 2026
Language
EN