Radiomic Clustering of First-Order Features Predicts Postoperative Outcomes Following Pituitary Adenoma Resection

View at publisher
Authors: Mohammad A. Hamo, Dhanush Amin, Yifei Sun, Alexander Joseph Mullen, Hariteja Ramapuram, Michael E. Ivan, Carolina Benjamin, Kristen O. Riley, Elizabeth J. Liptrap, Dagoberto Estévez-Ordoñez
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Background: Transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas can result in adverse outcomes, including diabetes insipidus (DI), hypopituitarism, hyponatremia, and unplanned readmissions. Radiomic analysis offers a means to characterize tumor heterogeneity through first-order intensity features. Unsupervised clustering of first-order radiomic features may help identify patients at risk of postoperative complications. Methods: We conducted a single center, retrospective review of 77 patients from 2012 to 2024 who underwent transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas. Preoperative and outcome variables were obtained. T1- and T2-weighted images we acquired as part of routine preoperative care. Scans were obtained by 1.5T or 3T scanners using standard pituitary protocols, and image slice thickness ranged from 1-3mm. Exact acquisition parameters varied based on scanner and year of acquisition, and outputs were studied for variations in quality (e.g., slice thickness). Masks were segmented or verified by a neuroradiology fellow (DA) near the completion of fellowship training. Radiomic feature extraction was performed using PyRadiomics (version 3.0.1, Python 3.11.4), extracting first-order features. Data was preprocessed, and k-means clustering with elbow method was used to define subgroups. Subgroups were statistically compared for outcomes using Chi-square, with Fisher’s exact test for pairwise comparisons. Results: First-order statistics included 18 features reflecting tumor heterogeneity through uniformity, brightness, and pixel distribution. Clustering generated 3 subgroups: cluster 1 with low-intensity tumors (n=33), cluster 2 with heterogenous or intermediate intensity (n=36), and cluster 3 with hyperintense tumors (n=8). Postoperative diabetes insipidus was significantly different between groups (p = 0.002), with pairwise comparisons revealing higher rates in cluster 3 compared to 1 and 2 (p = 0.007, 0.001, respectively). Other outcomes, including hypopituitarism, hyponatremia, and readmissions within 30, 60, or 90 days revealed no differences between groups (p = 0.409, 0.943, 0.483, 0.509, 0.130, respectively). Conclusion: Unsupervised clustering of radiomic features may help define higher-risk subgroups following transsphenoidal resection. Large, multi-institutional cohorts could help confirm generalizability and guide postoperative monitoring strategies. Fig. 1 Principle component analysis plot showing separation of patients into three radiomic subgroups based on first-order features Fig. 2 Example of MRI input and tumor mask segmentation Publication History Article published online: 27 February 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fields of Study & Subjects

Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Volume
87
Issue
S 01
Pages
S1–S548
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN