Mega Flap for Reconstruction of Clival Defects: Cadaveric and Microvascular Dissection Study

View at publisher
Authors: Rakhmon Egamberdiev, Thibault Passeri, Gianluca Lorenzo Fabozzi, Maria Karampouga, Guoqiang Zhao, Longgang Yu, Garret W. Choby, Eric W. Wang, Georgios Andrea Zenonos, Paul A. Gardner, Carl Henry Snyderman
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The evolution of endoscopic endonasal approaches for increasingly complex pathologies in both sagittal and coronal planes has expanded the role of vascularized flaps in skull base reconstruction. The standard nasoseptal flap, while versatile, is often insufficient for large or multidirectional defects and may be compromised by prior surgery, necessitating extended modifications. Validation of their anatomical reach and vascular reliability is essential to establish their clinical utility. Methods: Two cadaveric heads underwent endoscopic endonasal dissection to harvest extended combined nasoseptal, nasal floor, and lateral nasal wall flaps (Mega Flap [MF]). Large bilateral clival defects involving the upper, middle, and lower clivus were created. MF length, width, and reach were measured relative to the clival defect. Microvascular dissection was performed to identify pedicle dominance, branching patterns, and anastomotic channels. Results: Extended MF were harvested successfully in all specimens and demonstrated sufficient length and width to achieve complete clival coverage. Microvascular analysis revealed a dual-pedicle blood supply from the sphenopalatine artery: the posterior septal artery as the dominant pedicle and the inferior turbinate artery providing supplementary branches. Anastomotic channels reinforced the perfusion of the septal, lateral, and inferior portions of the flap. This architecture ensured robust and redundant vascularity. Conclusion: The MF provides reliable anatomical coverage for large skull base defects. Its dual-pedicle vascular supply, confirmed by microvascular dissection, supports its potential as a durable reconstructive option after expanded endonasal approaches to the skull base. Fig. 1 Anatomical dissection images demonstrating the vascular anatomy of the mega flap. (A) Left-sided view showing the superior branch, inferior branch, anterior nasal (AN) branch, and posterior nasal (PN) artery branches. (B) Right-sided view highlighting the branches of the inferior turbinate artery. (C) Inferior perspective of the flap demonstrating vascular distribution along the nasal floor mucosa. Fig. 2 Endoscopic endonasal view of the large clivus defect and posterior fossa. S – Sella turcica, C – Paraclival carotid artery. The basilar artery (BA) is visualized in the midline, flanked by the abducens nerves (6th) coursing laterally. The foramen lacerum (FL) and vidian nerve (VN) are also identified. Fig. 3 Endoscopic endonasal view demonstrating reconstruction of a large skull base defect with a vascularized nasoseptal “mega flap.” The flap provides robust coverage of the defect, ensuring adequate sealing and protection of the underlying neurovascular structures. Publication History Article published online: 27 February 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fields of Study & Subjects

Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Volume
87
Issue
S 01
Pages
S1–S548
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN