Lost in translation: why pharmacological trials keep failing in acute spinal cord injury

Read full text
Authors: Abelardo Araújo
Cited by: 1
References: 24

Abstract

Abstract Despite four decades of translational research, no pharmacological agent has been approved for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) based on class-I evidence. The current narrative review critically examines the seven agents evaluated in phase-II to -III clinical trials—methylprednisolone (MPSS), GM-1 monosialotetrahexosylganglioside, minocycline, riluzole, anti-Nogo-A antibody NG101, VX-210, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)—with emphasis on quantitative effect estimates, confidence intervals, and mechanisms of translational failure. Polylaminin, under phase-I evaluation approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, ANVISA, in Portuguese), is discussed in the context of disproportionate public communication relative to the stage of evidence; available human data are limited to a small, uncontrolled, unreviewed pilot study insufficient for efficacy inferences. High-dose MPSS conferred no motor recovery benefit in a meta-analysis of 1,863 participants and was significantly associated with gastrointestinal hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.02–4.20) and respiratory infections (OR = 1.73; 95%CI: 1.12–2.68). Furthermore, GM-1 ganglioside, G-CSF, and VX-210 failed to meet the prespecified primary endpoints. Minocycline produced inconclusive results in an underpowered phase-II study. Riluzole (Riluzole in Spinal Cord Injury Study [RISCIS]), which was prematurely terminated at 55% of enrollment due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, showed a significant motor benefit in patients classified as grade C according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) (+8.0 points; 95%CI: 1.5–14.4; 2-tailed p = 0.034). The Nogo Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury (NISCI) trial (2025), the most methodologically rigorous SCI trial to date, demonstrated no primary endpoint benefit but identified functional signals in motor-incomplete injuries. In total, six structural domains of translational failure are identified and methodological solutions proposed.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Spinal Cord Injury Research Nerve injury and regeneration Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Volume
84
Issue
08
Pages
001–009
Publication date
1 August 2026
Language
EN