Evaluating Noninferiority in Clinical Trials with a Hierarchical End Point

View at publisher
Authors: John Gregson, Bjorn Redfors, David J. Cohen, Duane S. Pinto, Martin P. Fahy, Stuart Pocock
Cited by: 1
References: 18

Abstract

AbstractThe win ratio is a method for analyzing a clinical hierarchy of outcomes. It is most commonly applied to randomized clinical trials to evaluate the superiority of an intervention versus the standard of care. Once an intervention is approved, a noninferiority trial may be used to assess whether or not an alternative intervention is as effective. The authors explain how to select an appropriate noninferiority margin in terms of the win ratio, while emphasizing the importance of translating it into familiar metrics (e.g., rate ratios, differences in means) for easier interpretation. This framework is illustrated with a worked example of a hypothetical trial. The authors provide practical guidance on how the win ratio could be effectively used in future noninferiority trials.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Advanced Causal Inference Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
NEJM Evidence
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
EVIDctw2500029–EVIDctw2500029
Publication date
24 February 2026
Language
EN