Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI

View at publisher
Authors: William F. Fearon, Allen Jeremias, Guy Witberg, Rasha Al-Lamee, David J. Cohen, Amir Kaki, Rahul P. Sharma, Robert W. Yeh, Bassem M Chehab, M. Kim, Hiromasa Otake, Rajiv Tayal
+16 more H M Matsuo, Margaret McEntegart, Ankitkumar K. Patel, Yader Sandoval, Karim M. Al-Azizi, Kazuhiro Dan, Louai Razzouk, Stephane Fournier, Alexandra Popma, Jeffrey J. Popma, Duzhi Zhao, Bjorn Redfors, Mahesh V. Madhavan, Ran Kornowski, Martin B. Leon, Ajay J. Kirtane
Cited by: 21
References: 20

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing intermediate coronary lesions with an intracoronary pressure wire improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, clinical use of pressure-wire-based physiological assessment remains low. Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiographic images alone correlates well with pressure-wire-based FFR measurements and may simplify procedures, but its effect on clinical outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In this international noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing coronary angiography who were found to have at least one intermediate coronary stenosis to physiological assessment with measurements derived from angiographic images (FFRangio) or with pressure-wire-based measurements. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned, clinically indicated coronary revascularization at 1 year. The noninferiority margin was 3.5 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 1930 patients were randomly assigned to physiological assessment with FFRangio (FFRangio group; 965 patients) or a pressure-wire-based approach (pressure-wire group; 965 patients). The mean age of the patients was 68.4 years, and 25.0% of the patients were women. At 1 year, a primary end-point event had occurred in 64 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.9%) in the FFRangio group and 65 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 7.1%) in the pressure-wire group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.39; difference, -0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval, 2.1 percentage points; P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics Vascular Procedures and Complications Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Publication details

Journal / source
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Volume
395
Issue
1
Pages
9–19
Publication date
29 March 2026
Language
EN