Interface Friction Angle from Ring Shear Tests on Sand: A Round Robin

View at publisher
Authors: Santiago Quinteros, Rune Dyvik, Ingrid Peikli, Diana C. A. Silva, Ali Seiphoori, Zack Westgate, Mussie Kidane, Danilo Zepilli, Kenny Kataoka Sørensen, Sumin Song, Anjali Uday, Roberto Cudmani
+4 more Bereket Mamo Gebremeskel, Hans Henning Stutz, Ana Franco, Ze Chen
Cited by: 2
References: 25

Abstract

The interface friction angle is a crucial design parameter for various foundations, including piles, suction buckets, anchors, gravity-based structures, pipelines, cables, and more. In the past decade, the exponential growth of offshore wind projects has led to a higher demand for multistage ring shear tests to mimic installation effects. Moreover, there is a need to obtain reliable interface friction angles, due to the potential savings in manufacturing, transportation, and installation of foundations, such as monopiles. To investigate the reliability of the interface friction angle obtained by laboratories worldwide, a round-robin testing program on interface shear tests of sand against rough steel is presented. This study focuses primarily on the most common ring shear devices, including the Bishop type and the Bromhead. Results from 42 ring shear tests conducted on 30 different devices across 19 laboratories (using the same sand and similar procedures) are presented and compared. The data suggest that the residual interface friction angle (δres) obtained from Bromhead can be 10% to 35% higher than that obtained from the Bishop ring shear apparatus. Significant scatter was observed in the results, as the Bishop ring shear yielded a δres=26.2°±0.8° (mean and standard deviation), while for the Bromhead devices, a δres=30.5°±3.5° (min=23.7° and max=39.4°) was derived, indicating that the Bromhead device could overestimate δres, in sand, by an average of approximately Δδres=4° or more. Additional tests revealed that careful specimen reconstitution is necessary to avoid creating extra friction between the sand and the confining rings in the Bromhead ring shear device. Furthermore, as suggested in previous studies, decreasing the settlements during consolidation (to

Fields of Study & Subjects

Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics Seismic Performance and Analysis Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Publisher
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Volume
152
Issue
6
Publication date
18 March 2026
Language
EN