The role of focusing geometry in MeV x-ray production from petawatt laser–solid interaction

Read full text
Authors: J. Strehlow, C. Herrera-Hernandez, C.-S. Wong, Lin Yin, Scott V. Luedtke, Sasikumar Palaniyappan, D. J. Stark, C-K Huang, Alemayehu Bogale, T. A. Coffman, Rebecca Fitzgarrald, L. Tyler Mix
+22 more Ryan Nedbailo, D. Rusby, J. L. Schmidt, Kavin Tangtartharakul, Jacek Twardowski, Ashlyn Van Pelt, Sandra Bruce, A. Helal, Mathieu Médina, Hernan J. Quevedo, M. M. Spinks, F. N. Beg, E. A. Chowdhury, Todd Ditmire, A. G. R. Thomas, J. C. Fernández, Donald Cort Gautier, James F. Hunter, Yong Ho Kim, Kevin D. Meaney, Alexey V. Arefiev, Brian J. Albright
Cited by: 1
References: 53

Abstract

Relativistic laser–plasma interactions provide a compact and flexible route to generating bright, ultrashort pulses of MeV x rays, with applications in high-energy density science, nuclear physics, and radiography. Despite extensive study of intensity scaling in laser-driven electron acceleration, the role of focusing geometry and focal-volume effects in MeV radiation production remains insufficiently understood. Here, we present experimental and kinetic simulation results from the Texas Petawatt Laser (120 J, 140 fs) in which the focusing geometry (f/3 or f/1.5) is varied, while the laser energy and pulse duration are fixed. Experimentally, the f/3 geometry produces approximately three times more MeV radiation than the f/1.5 geometry, despite its twofold lower nominal vacuum intensity. This result is based on the time-integrated radiation per unit solid angle, as measured along the diagnostic line of sight. Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations reproduce this trend when a modest (10s of μm) effective focal plane shift is introduced, demonstrating that relativistic laser–plasma coupling is highly sensitive to focal geometry in the presence of a preplasma. This behavior is consistent with differences in interaction length and effective intensity at the critical surface between the two configurations. The sensitivity of the tightly focused f/1.5 configuration (zR≈ 5 μm) reflects the combined influence of thermal lensing and an extended preplasma, while the f/3 geometry (zR≈ 80 μm) remains comparatively robust. These results demonstrate a breakdown of conventional intensity scaling and identify focusing geometry as a critical control parameter for MeV electron and x-ray generation at petawatt powers. Implications for laser–plasma-based radiographic facilities are also discussed.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics Laser Material Processing Techniques Atomic and Molecular Physics

Publication details

Journal / source
Physics of Plasmas
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Volume
33
Issue
4
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN