Revisiting United States v. South Carolina: The Birth of the Modern Teacher Licensure Exam

View at publisher
Authors: Alexander Cuenca, Kyle P. O’Brien
Cited by: 1
References: 22

Abstract

This study examines how the legal arguments in United States v. South Carolina (1978) established a “rational relationship” between teaching and validated teacher licensure exams. Findings reveal that these arguments promoted racial objectivity, masked arbitrary decisions as rigorous, and reframed teacher education programs as workforce development. These precedents have perpetuated the commonsense that licensure exams are essential for ensuring teacher quality, despite ongoing concerns about their predictive validity and disparate impact on teachers of color.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Legal Issues in Education Teacher Education and Assessments Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

Publication details

Journal / source
The Educational Forum
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
220–236
Publication date
3 February 2026
Language
EN