Trends and Harms of Election Denialism: The United States and Australia

Read full text
Authors: Lisa Hill
Cited by: 1
References: 38

Abstract

‘Trends in Election Denialism: the United States and Australia’ ‘Election denialism’ denotes the claim that an election has been ‘stolen’ or rigged either by private individuals or, more disturbingly, by election authorities. Although an increasingly common form of political disinformation, we tend to think of it as a problem largely confined to the US. But, as I show in this empirically-informed political theory paper, it is now also becoming an Australian problem. I lay out and compare the character and extent of the problem in the US and Australia, then show how election conspiracism can, does and may undermine democracy in both settings. I do so by enlisting a proceduralist conception of democracy and democratic legitimacy in order to assess its harms and to comprehend them in relation to the purpose and function of elections in representative democracies. A key theme is to understand why Australia has proved to be more resilient to disinformation about the authenticity of electoral processes and outcomes.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Commonwealth Australian Politics and Federalism Law Rights and Freedoms Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Representation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Pages
1–22
Publication date
13 April 2026
Language
EN