The lure of automated feedback

For over a century, teacher evaluation in the U.S. has been the primary practice providing feedback to teachers on their performance. However, coaching, because of its promising results, is fast becoming a preferred source. In addition, there are reports that a “computer coach”—not a “human person”—is giving teachers feedback. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) enabled feedback and its digital technology have the potential to change the practice of delivering feedback to teachers, promising to save time and reduce paperwork. It also appeals to our need to simplify and reduce the hard work of improving teaching while being convenient, unobtrusive, and easy to use. This article describes how automated feedback, an emerging practice that has become a federal educational priority, has arrived at this moment, what appears to be its promises and challenges, and what cautions should guide practice. The author hopes that educators will not be lured by the promises of automated feedback but stay informed and cautious. In addition, the author hopes this article starts a conversation before automated feedback circumscribes practice.