Looking the other way: what happened to the weaponization of water?

View at publisher
Authors: Eliška Pohnerová
Cited by: 3
References: 48

Abstract

Water and water infrastructure is granted legal protection under international law, making it eligible for normative safeguards. Yet, this normative expectation is challenged by records of states using water as a weapon. The article applies qualitative content analysis, looking into what is theorized to be the most water taboo-compliant country, the United States. It investigates its advocacy of the prohibitory norm on water weaponization in three conflicts: the Russo-Ukrainian War, the Israel–Hamas War, and the Yemeni Civil War. The analysis shows that water norms in practice are closer to humanitarian crisis prevention than a source of stigmatization based on abhorrence.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Water Treatment and Disinfection Nuclear Issues and Defense Transboundary Water Resource Management

Publication details

Journal / source
Water International
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
4–36
Publication date
2 January 2026
Language
EN