Does Lliuya v RWE mark a turning point in climate litigation: examining the establishment of causation

View at publisher
Authors: Mengyu Cui, Hao Zhang
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Lliuya v RWE is widely celebrated for recognising, in principle, that corporations may be held liable for climate-related damage. This case note analyses the appellate court’s reasoning on causation. While the court acknowledged a causal link between corporate emissions and specific property damage, it ultimately held the damage alleged did not meet the threshold for remedies and therefore did not determine causation on the facts. The case highlights the limits of the but-for test and difficulties of integrating scientific evidence into legal analysis, while offering guidance for future climate litigation through its use of property law and on-site expert assessments.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Environmental law and policy Corporate Law and Human Rights International Arbitration and Investment Law

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Pages
1–16
Publication date
26 February 2026
Language
EN