The Relationship Between Barbell Velocity and the Final Five Repetitions in Reserve Across Multiple Sets of the Hang Clean

View at publisher
Authors: Justin A. Kraft, Sergio L. Molina, William D. Russell, Maureen E. Holtz, James Matthew Green
Cited by: 0
References: 39

Abstract

Barbell velocity decreases as proximity to exercise endpoint approaches. This study aimed to determine if mean velocity at a given number of repetitions in reserve (RIR) was stable across differing intensity levels and multiple sets during hang clean exercise. Nineteen Division II male athletes (20.1 ± 1.1 years) completed two trials (3 sets to failure at 70% and 80% 1RM). The final five RIR of each set were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVAs (p ≤ .05). No differences in mean velocity between any set or intensity were observed for 5 RIR, 3 RIR, or 1 RIR. Pairwise differences were observed during 4 RIR (80% 1RM set 3 (1.13 ± 0.09 m/s) vs. 70% 1RM set 2 (1.20 ± 0.12 m/s)) and 2 RIR (80% 1RM set 2 (1.06 ± 0.15 m/s) vs. 70% RM set 2 (1.15 ± 0.13 m/s), 80% 1RM set 3 (1.04 ± 0.12 m/s) vs. 70% 1RM set 1 (1.12 ± 0.15 m/s) and set 2 (1.15 ± 0.13 m/s), and 70% 1RM set 2 (1.15 ± 0.13 m/s) vs. 70% 1RM set 3 (1.09 ± 0.14 m/s)). Effect sizes for significant pairwise differences ranged from 0.44–0.79. While several pairwise differences existed, lack of systematic trends indicated mean velocity at a given RIR was not generally influenced by set number or intensity. Thus, velocity for a given RIR appears stable across multiple sets and intensities in the hang clean. These velocities can be utilized to identify remaining RIR and adjust training.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sports Performance and Training Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics Cardiovascular and exercise physiology

Publication details

Journal / source
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
428–435
Publication date
18 February 2026
Language
EN