Trust falls: analyzing trust in science as a moderator ofsource credibility in contentious scientific contexts

View at publisher
Authors: Andrew Daniels, Emily A. Andrews, Nathan Walter
Cited by: 0
References: 21

Abstract

The presumed importance of source credibility has left a mark on communication theory and practice. However, increased polarization and distrust in scientific authority raise questions surrounding the contemporary usefulness of source credibility. The present study (N = 248) examines how scientific trust influences perceptions of source expertise and trustworthiness. Results demonstrate a significant moderating effect of trust in science on the dimensions of perceived source expertise and trustworthiness. These findings highlight the consequences of widespread structural erosion of trust in science, potentially pointing to the conditions required to enhance persuasive scientific appeals using source credibility.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Misinformation and Its Impacts Climate Change Communication and Perception Education Healthcare and Sociology Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Communication Research Reports
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
90–102
Publication date
4 January 2026
Language
EN