To Disclose or Not to Disclose: How AI Use Transparency Increases Trust in Fact-Checking

View at publisher
Authors: Myojung Chung, Jihyang Choi, S. Mo Jones-Jang
Cited by: 1
References: 40

Abstract

This study examines how transparency about AI-assisted fact-checking shapes audience trust and misbelief correction. An experiment (N = 393) manipulating AI use disclosure levels (no disclosure, simple disclosure, detailed disclosure, third-party disclosure) found that disclosing AI use does not reduce message, author, or source credibility. Detailed disclosure that clarifies procedures and human oversight enhances author and source credibility through increased perceived transparency. By contrast, third-party revelation of undisclosed AI use substantially undermines credibility and weakens misbelief correction. These findings indicate that disclosure timing and detail, rather than AI use per se, are central to maintaining trust in journalistic fact-checking.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Misinformation and Its Impacts Deception detection and forensic psychology

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
1–17
Publication date
20 April 2026
Language
EN