What Makes Social Work an Art? §

Read full text
Authors: Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

This paper begins by defining beauty and sublimity within social work, establishing the significance of aesthetics as encompassing both dimensions. It distinguishes between beauty—characterised by pleasantness and charm—and sublimity, marked by awe-inspiring and terrifying qualities. Two detailed practice vignettes—an adult daughter caring for a chronically ill parent and a young person experiencing philosophical loneliness—illustrate how Kantian aesthetics illuminate what clients encounter when facing situations that cannot be solved but must be lived with. The paper distinguishes between aesthetic reflexivity and problem-focused intervention, arguing that both matter but that traditional frameworks often overlook sublimity—the moral and existential complexity central to professional artistry. The paper’s principal contribution concerns aesthetic reflexivity in social workers, demonstrating that social work constitutes an art requiring sensibility and aesthetic connection with the clients. It argues that Kant’s aesthetic theory provides philosophical grounding for understanding aesthetics in social work practice. Finally, the paper addresses challenges to Kantian moral philosophy whilst demonstrating how his aesthetic theory offers a contemporary philosophical foundation for practitioners, scholars and educators, bridging professional artistry and the empirical world.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Social Work Education and Practice Ethics Aesthetics and Art Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Practice
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
209–221
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN