Rethinking Rationality. Scientists’ Perspectives on Health Communication After the COVID-19 Pandemic

View at publisher
Authors: Hella de Haas, Frank Marcinkowski, Sarah Kohler
Cited by: 0
References: 51

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic represented a turning point for many scientists, challenging established motives and attitudes toward public communication and raising new questions about their willingness to communicate publicly. During this time, scientists faced unprecedented scrutiny, leading to both recognition and maltreatment by the media, politicians and the public. This paper examines whether the pandemic experience altered scientists’ rationale for engaging in health communication—specifically, whether perceived benefits (e.g. contributing to the public good) still outweigh potential costs (e.g. exposure to hostility). Based on a survey of N = 4,207 researchers at German universities and research institutions, our findings indicate that negative perceptions of how politicians and journalists treated scientists diminished their assessment of public communication as a rational endeavor, leading to decreased willingness to communicate, particularly regarding self-interested motives.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Communication and COVID-19 Impact Academic Publishing and Open Access Public Relations and Crisis Communication

Publication details

Journal / source
Health Communication
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2194–2207
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN