Evaluating Citations and Retractions of 71 Write a Scientific Paper Guidelines

View at publisher
Authors: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets
Cited by: 0
References: 17

Abstract

A citation analysis was conducted on 71 Write a Scientific Paper (WASP) best practice guidelines (BPGs) published in Elsevier’s Early Human Development (EHD) during 2018–2019, exclusively by University of Malta researchers. By 18 January 2026, the 71 WASP BPGs had accumulated a total of 555 citations, with Victor Grech and Sarah Cuschieri gaining a total of 336 and 165 citations, respectively. An editorial expression of concern, published in 2021, encompasses 48 of the WASP BPGs, and of the 71 BPGs, 30 (42%) have been retracted. Amassing independent BPGs in a single journal with poor corrective measures carries risks.

Fields of Study & Subjects

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication

Publication details

Journal / source
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
161–171
Publication date
4 February 2026
Language
EN