Statewide Emergency Medical Services Protocols for Field-Initiated Blood Resuscitation

OBJECTIVES: Prehospital blood transfusion by emergency medical services (EMS) is associated with improved outcomes in trauma patients, but little is known about the statewide protocols that influence the availability and use of prehospital blood. This study aimed to describe statewide EMS protocols regarding field-initiated prehospital blood and blood product transfusion across the U.S. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available statewide EMS protocols pertaining to field-initiated blood or blood product use during ground transport by advanced life support (ALS) clinicians. We excluded protocols specific to critical care or interfacility transport. We used a standardized data collection tool to compare clinical indications, blood product type, and considerations for pediatrics and biologically female patients who may bear children in the future. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the protocols. RESULTS: We identified 31 states and the District of Columbia with publicly available statewide EMS protocols. Thirteen (42%) of these protocols allowed for field-initiated prehospital blood transfusion. There was variability regarding recommendations for transfusion indications and the details of administration in the protocols. All protocols allowed for transfusion in traumatic emergencies, and nine (69%) allowed for transfusion in medical emergencies. Three (23%) protocols specifically recommended low titer group O whole blood, and three (23%) protocols allowed transfusion during cardiac arrest. Nine (69%) protocols allowed for transfusion in pediatric patients. Only four (31%) protocols included special considerations for transfusing blood to biologically female patients. CONCLUSIONS: While most statewide EMS protocols in the US did not include field-initiated blood transfusion, the protocols that do exist vary widely. With the increasing implementation of prehospital blood programs, these findings suggest an opportunity to provide more robust evidence-based guidelines for prehospital blood transfusion to improve patient care and outcomes.