Ethics of Antibiotic Course Duration: Shorter is Better

Read full text
Authors: Tess Johnson, George S Heriot, Euzebiusz Jamrozik
Cited by: 16
References: 55

Abstract

Antibiotic treatment course duration has for decades been dictated by two questionable ideas: first, that longer courses are more effective at curing bacterial infections; second, that longer courses are less likely to lead to drug resistance. Recently, the "shorter is better" movement has challenged the received wisdom, showing shorter-duration antibiotic courses provide similar cure rates, fewer antibiotic-related harms, and possibly less contribution to of antibiotic resistance for common infections. Yet, physicians typically still prescribe longer courses of antibiotics than clinical guidelines recommend. This is ethically unacceptable. In this paper, we argue that prescribing physicians are ethically obligated to prescribe shorter antibiotic courses, given that prescribing physicians bear duties both toward their patients and to protect public health. We rebut objections to our argument and furthermore argue for an ethical obligation of physician-researchers to conduct further trials comparing the shortest current evidence-based course of antibiotics with courses that are even shorter.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Antibiotic Use and Resistance Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Publication details

Journal / source
The American Journal of Bioethics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
79–93
Publication date
6 March 2026
Language
EN