How does physical education teacher education prepare preservice teachers to make practical judgements when teaching games? A case study

Background In the last 40 years, physical education (PE) scholars have developed an array of approaches for teaching games. This development is positive in that PE professionals now have a wealth of practically-oriented scholarship to help them teach games. Yet the widespread availability of prescriptions for teaching games potentially reduces both the need and opportunity for teachers to exercise their practical judgement when working with games.Aim The specific aim of the current investigation is to develop an understanding of how physical education teacher education (PETE) provides preservice teachers with opportunities to develop practical judgement with respect to games teaching in one course.Theoretical framework We rely on Joseph Dunne's (Dunne, Joseph. 1997. Back to the Rough Ground: Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Pess; Dunne, Joseph. 2005. “An intricate fabric: Understanding the rationality of practice.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 13 (3): 367–390) notion of practical judgement. Practical judgement refers to the knowledge individuals use in complex and dynamic situations, where they need to find resonance between general principles relevant to a practice and the particular characteristics of the situation they are dealing with.Methods Nine practical PETE lessons focusing on games were observed over a period of three weeks at one university in Sweden. Three three-hour lessons took place once with approximately 44 students. Three two-hour lessons took place twice (i.e. six times in total), each time with half the student cohort. Video data were produced by one researcher. The researcher alternated between active participation and passive participation in the lessons.Findings The PETE lessons provided the preservice teachers with four different types of opportunities to exercise their practical judgement: (1) opportunities to judge how principles of games teaching would operate in school contexts; (2) opportunities to compare different approaches and content against one another; (3) opportunities to consider the teacher educator's pedagogical decisions; and (4) opportunities for preservice teachers to take on teaching roles.Discussion We suggest that problematic situations where different interests compete and where deliberation is necessary, are valuable in PETE contexts. We also propose that providing space for preservice teachers to exercise their practical judgement may mean that they make loosely informed decisions. The investigation thus provides insights into a common trend seen in games scholarship.Impact statement This case study reminds physical educators of the importance of working reflectively when teaching games. In the context of a long-standing debate about effective ways to teach games, the paper provides physical education teacher educators with concrete examples of how an expert games educator encouraged the preservice teachers in his course to use their practical judgement.