Insights from expert panels on the EU clinical evaluation consultation procedure

Read full text
Authors: Hilde Bastaerts, Francesca Romana Del Vecchio, Miguel Antunes, Iordanis Sidiropoulos, Cécile Henrot, Agnieszka Ciarka, V. Dietz, Per Kjærsgaard‐Andersen, Ernst Klar, Rob Nelissen, Vasileios Sakalis, Iana Simova
+3 more Raul Sousa, Sven Zenker, Silvy da Rocha Dias
Cited by: 1
References: 12

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Evaluation Consultation Procedure (CECP) under the EU Medical Device Regulation aims to strengthen and harmonize the assessment of high-risk medical devices. This review summarizes early insights from expert panels to support improved clinical evaluation practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This review analyses 34 expert panel opinions derived from 281 CECP submissions between April 2021 and December 2025. Statements from opinions were systematically extracted, de-duplicated, and grouped into thematic categories, with independent review and validation. The analysis focuses on common challenges found during the consultation procedure of the expert panels on the content of the clinical assessment in relation to clinical evidence, benefit-risk assessment, intended purpose alignment, and post-market clinical follow-up planning. RESULTS: Expert panel findings highlight recurrent issues in the sufficiency, consistency, and transparency of clinical evidence, underscoring the need for improved standardization and clearer guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening documentation quality and alignment across stakeholders will enhance the robustness, efficiency, and predictability of conformity assessments for high-risk medical devices.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Health Systems Economic Evaluations Quality of Life Clinical practice guidelines implementation Quality and Safety in Healthcare

Publication details

Journal / source
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1149–1159
Publication date
28 July 2026
Language
EN