Internal consistency and construct validity of the WASI–II subtests and composite scores in a clinical sample

View at publisher
Authors: Joseph J. Ryan, David S. Kreiner, Samuel T. Gontkovsky, Marley W. Watkins
Cited by: 0
References: 20

Abstract

We determined WASI–II reliability for 100 outpatients with neurological, psychiatric, or developmental disorders. Means for age and education were 47.95 years (SD = 17.86) and 13.57 years (SD = 2.39). The design involved a total sample divided into neurological (n = 41) and psychiatric (n = 53) subgroups. Developmental disorders were included only in the total sample analyses (n = 6). Subtest split-half reliabilities ranged from .95 for Matrix Reasoning to .83 for Similarities. VCI, PRI, and FSIQ coefficients ranged from .91 to .97, .95 to .97, and .95 to .97. Omega (h) statistics, after controlling a general factor, were .408 and .365 for VCI and PRI. Support for WASI–II construct validity were also presented.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Publication details

Journal / source
Applied Neuropsychology Adult
Pages
1–6
Publication date
19 January 2026
Language
EN