Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of the ACT DR5 Galaxy Clusters with the DES Year 3 Weak Lensing Data

Read full text
Authors: T. Shin, E. J. Baxter, E. Lee, N. Battaglia, A. Alarcon, A. Amon, M. Becker, G. Bernstein, J. R. Bond, A. C. CAMPOS, C. Chang, R. Chen
+84 more A. Choi, Joseph DeRose, S. Dodelson, C. Doux, J. Dunkley, J. Elvin-Poole, J. H. Esteves, S. Everett, A. Ferté, M. Gatti, S. Grandis, D Gruen, I Harrison, J. C. Hill, Matt Hilton, M. Jarvis, N. MacCrann, J. McCullough, K. Moodley, T Mroczkowski, J. Myles, A Navarro-Alsina, A. Nicola, L. Page, S. Pandey, J. Prat, M Raveri, B. Ried Guachalla, R. P. Rollins, C. Sanchez, L F Secco, E. Sheldon, Cristobál Sifón, M. Troxel, I. Tutusaus, A. von der Linden, E. Wollack, B. Yin, M. Aguena, S. Allam, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, D. Bacon, S. Bocquet, D. Brooks, R Camilleri, A. Carnero Rosell, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, M. Costanzi, L. da Costa, M. E. da Silva Pereira, T. Davis, J. De Vicente, S. Desai, B. Flaugher, J Frieman, J. Garcia-Bellido, G. Gutierrez, S. Hinton, D. L. Hollowood, Dragan Huterer, D. James, S. W. Lee, J. Marshall, J. Mena-Fernández, F. Menanteau, R. Miquel, J. J. Mohr, J. Muir, R. Ogando, A. A. Plazas Malagón, A. Porredon, K. Romer, E. Sanchez, D. Sanchez Cid, I. Sevilla, M. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, E. Suchyta, M. Swanson, C. To, N. Weaverdyck, J. Weller
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract We use weak gravitational lensing measurements from Year 3 Dark Energy Survey data to calibrate the masses of 443 galaxy clusters selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 5 maps of the cosmic microwave background. We incorporate redshift and SZ measurements for individual clusters into a hierarchical model for the stacked lensing signals and perform Bayesian analyses to constrain the hydrostatic mass bias of the clusters. Our treatment of systematic uncertainties includes a prescription for measuring and accounting for the weak lensing boost factor, consideration of a miscentering effect, as well as marginalization over uncertainties in the source galaxy photometric redshift distributions and shear calibration. The resultant constraints on the normalization of the mass-observable relation have a precision of approximately 7%, with the mean WL halo mass of M 500c = 5.4 × 10 14 M ⊙ . We measure the bias between the true cluster mass and the mass estimated from the SZ signal based on an X-ray–calibrated scaling relation assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, to be 1 - b = 0.74 +0.06 -0.05 over the full sample. When splitting the clusters into high ( z = 0.43–0.70) and low ( z = 0.15–0.43) redshift bins, we measure 1 - b = 0.58 +0.06 -0.05 and 0.81 +0.08 -0.06 , respectively. When introducing additional freedom in redshift and mass to the hydrostatic bias model, we find that 1 - b decreases with redshift (with the power law of -1.8 +0.5 -0.6 , 99.95% confidence), consistent with findings from other recent studies, while we do not find any significant trend in mass. We also demonstrate that our result is robust against various systematics such as a scale cut, priors on baryonic and miscentering parameters, and degree of scatter in mass-observable relation. The weak-lensing mass calibration presented in this study will be a useful tool for using the ACT clusters as probes of astrophysics, and as a step towards using their abundance as a cosmological probe.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Galaxies: Formation Evolution Phenomena Astronomy and Astrophysical Research Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Volume
2026
Issue
08
Pages
075–075
Publication date
1 August 2026
Language
EN