Maintaining SUV accuracy in low-count PET with PETfectior: a deep learning denoising solution

Read full text
Authors: Yamila Rotstein Habarnau, Nicolas I. Bustos, Paola Corona, Christian González, Sonia S. Traverso, Federico Matorra, Francisco Javier Gallegos-Funes, Juan Martín Giraut, Laura T. Pelegrina, Gabriel da Silva Bruno, Mauro Namías
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

Abstract The diagnostic image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) acquisitions strongly depends on the administered radiotracer activity and acquisition time. However, keeping these variables as low as possible is desired to reduce patient radiation exposure and the radiopharmaceutical related costs of PET examinations. PETfectior is an artificial intelligence-based software that processes PET scans and increases the signal-to-noise ratio, obtaining high-quality images from low-count-rate images. In this study, we perform an initial clinical validation of PETfectior on images acquired with half of the counting statistics required to meet the most recent European Association of Nuclear Medicine quantitative standards for 18 F-FDG PET, evaluating lesion detectability, quantitative accuracy and image quality. 258 patients referred for 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were prospectively included. The standard-of-care scans (100% scans) were acquired and reconstructed according to EARL standards 2. Besides, half-counting-statistics versions of these images were obtained from list-mode data and processed with PETfectior (50% + PETfectior scans). All the oncologic lesions were segmented on both versions of the PET/CT images either manually or automatically and lesion detectability was evaluated. The SUV max of the lesions was measured and the quantitative concordance of 50% + PETfectior and 100% images was evaluated. Subjective image quality was visually assessed by two experienced physicians. 1649 lesions were detected in a total of 198 studies. The 50%+ PETfectior images showed high sensitivity for lesion detection (99.9%) and only one false positive was detected. Quantitative concordance of SUV max measured on 100% and 50% + PETfectior images was within ±12.5% (95% limits of agreement), with a bias of −1.01%. No difference in image quality between 50% + PETfectior and 100% images was found. We conclude that PETfectior can safely be used in the clinical practice with 18 F-FDG at half counting statistics, with high sensitivity and specificity, low quantitative bias and high subjective image quality, at least for the scanners evaluated in this study.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Publication details

Journal / source
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
045026–045026
Publication date
14 July 2026
Language
EN