Is field size an indicator of farm size in smallholder-dominated croplands?

Read full text
Authors: Sitian Xiong, Protensia Hadunka, Brian P. Mulenga, Kathy Baylis, Philippe Rufin, Lyndon Despard Estes
Cited by: 1
References: 36

Abstract

Abstract Farm size is a key characteristic of agricultural systems, closely linked to farming and land management practices. However, data on farm size are often difficult to obtain, especially in smallholder-dominated regions, and where available, they are rarely spatially explicit. This study examines the use of field size as a proxy for farm size, aiming to identify field size thresholds that can distinguish farms of different sizes. Using household-level data from Zambia’s Crop Forecast Survey, we applied both continuous and categorical methods to quantify the field-to-farm size relationship. Non-parametric Theil–Sen regression revealed a generally linear relationship between log-transformed field and farm sizes, particularly at the survey enumeration area scale, where farm size is proportional to field size (slope ≈ 1) and field size alone predicts farm size with a median bias of 0.017 ha. A Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier was also developed to assign fields to three categories: very small ( A : < 2 ha), small ( B : 2–5 ha), and medium ( C : 5–20 ha), and a coarser two-class scheme ( S : < 5 ha; M : 5–20 ha) that has been applied in previous studies. The Gaussian model identified field size thresholds at 0.58–0.6 ha ( A–B ) and 1.18–1.69 ha ( B–C ), depending on the prior farm size distribution. For the S–M scheme, thresholds ranged from 0.96–1.4 ha. Using these thresholds, national classification achieved F 1 scores of 0.78, 0.59, and 0.77 for A , B , and C , respectively, with B more prone to misclassification. The two-class model achieved 0.87 and 0.88 for S and M , indicating more robust classification performance under a coarser scheme. Kernel density analysis shows that field-size distributions within farm categories and the separability of these distributions, vary across regions, with the underlying factors responsible for these differences remaining an open question for future research. These results demonstrate the potential of field size as a spatial proxy for farm size to support remote sensing based farming system classification in data-scarce regions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Land Rights and Reforms Agricultural Innovations and Practices Agricultural Economics and Policy

Publication details

Journal / source
Environmental Research Food Systems
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
015008–015008
Publication date
23 February 2026