Coda: Spreading the Word

Abstract This chapter examines the social dimensions of normative inquiry, emphasizing the role of expertise and experts. The chapter argues that while normative engagement is deeply tied to individual perception and appreciation, it need not exclude collective epistemic labor. Central to the discussion is the distinction between different types of expertise and the social role of experts. The chapter critiques skepticism about whether we can reliably identify experts. It argues instead that expertise—especially perceptual and critical expertise—can be widespread and identifiable. To end, the chapter proposes the establishment of a new field: ethical criticism. This field would institutionalize the use of critical expertise in ethics, much like art criticism does for aesthetics, thereby supporting a new type of collective inquiry into ethics. While Iris Murdoch, Martha Nussbaum, and Cora Diamond have had similar ideas, the chapter distinguishes their ambitions from its own proposal. The chapter concludes by emphasizing that shared practices of critical engagement can enhance our moral perspectives and contribute to a more humane and appreciative ethical culture.