Competence versus performance II

View at publisher
Authors: Jeffrey L. Lidz, Tyler Knowlton
Cited by: 0
References: 10

Abstract

Abstract As in Chapter 20, this chapter focuses on the competence/performance distinction and when to attribute non-adult-like performance to a lack of grammatical knowledge, as opposed to unrelated performance failures. It focuses, in particular, on the case of null subjects—when 2-year-olds sometimes omit a sentence’s grammatical subject (e.g., saying eat cookie or came home). One hypothesis is that children “default” to a grammar that permits null subjects, like Spanish, which allows subjects to go unexpressed. This hypothesis is contrasted with performance accounts, on which children have acquired the correct rules for licensing subjects in their language, but other (extragrammatical) factors intervene to cause them to fail to produce overt subjects.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Language Development and Disorders Syntax Semantics Linguistic Variation Child and Animal Learning Development

Publication details

Journal / source
Oxford University Press eBooks
Pages
237–243
Publication date
23 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter