Objective List Theory

Abstract This chapter examines the objective list theory of well-being, starting from an analogy between the theory and common-sense morality in normative ethics. It then explains the two essential claims of objective list theories. These are, first, that prudential value is attitude-independent and, second, that it is capable of no substantive explanation beyond the goods on the list. It also explains why pluralism is typical of, but inessential to, objective list theories. The chapter explains how the theory fares in comparison with its main competitors: desire fulfilment theory, perfectionism, and hedonism. It also shows how the theory can positively respond to the charge of providing an alienating conception of well-being along with the objection that it is merely an unconnected heap of goods.