Blood transcriptomic signatures predict poor outcomes in drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazil

Read full text
Authors: Simon C Mendelsohn, B. C. O. P. Andrade, Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Gustavo Amorim, Mzwandile Erasmus, A. L. Andrade, Michelle L. Fisher, Marina C. Figueiredo, Vanessa Mwebaza Muwanga, Afrânio Lineu Kritski, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos, Valeria C Rolla
+20 more Mark Hatherill, Timothy R Sterling, Thomas J Scriba, members of the RePORT South Africa, Nicole Bilek, Yolundi Cloete, Katie Hadley, Rieyaat Hassiem, Lungisa Jaxa, Stanley Kimbung Mbandi, Faheemah Meyer, Humphrey Mulenga, Onke Nombida, Alison September, Ashley Veldsman, and RePORT-Brazil Consortia, Brenda Carvalho, Adriano Gomes, Cody Staats, Megan Turner
Cited by: 1
References: 54

Abstract

RATIONALE: Non-sputum biomarkers to monitor tuberculosis treatment and predict poor outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate host-blood transcriptomic signatures for treatment monitoring and prognosis of death, treatment failure, and recurrence in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: Adults with culture-confirmed, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled at 5 Brazilian sites. Whole-blood PAXgene samples were collected at baseline, month 2 (M2), and end of treatment (EoT). Treatment failure was defined as sputum culture positivity at month 5 or later. Participants were followed for 24 months from treatment initiation for clinical or microbiological tuberculosis recurrence. Unfavorable outcomes were matched ∼1:3 to recurrence-free cure. Twenty-two published blood transcriptomic signatures were measured by microfluidic RT-qPCR and benchmarked against the WHO Target Product Profile (TPP) criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We matched 263 participants with recurrence-free cure to 33 with treatment failure, 24 who died (tuberculosis/unknown cause), and 9 with recurrence. Signature scores generally declined from baseline to EoT. Multiple signatures measured at baseline and M2 predicted recurrence (AUC range 0.71-0.91), with waning performance when measured at EoT (AUC range 0.42-0.89). Against the WHO TPP, 2/22 signatures met minimum criteria at baseline, 13/22 at M2, and none at EoT. Prediction of treatment failure was poor across timepoints (AUC < 0.70). In contrast, several signatures measured at baseline predicted death during treatment or follow-up (AUC ≥ 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Blood transcriptomic signatures tracked treatment response and predicted recurrence and death, meeting WHO TPP benchmarks at baseline and M2. These findings support prospective, biomarker-guided trials to individualize tuberculosis therapy-shortening regimens for early responders and intensifying care for high-risk patients.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Publication details

Journal / source
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
212
Issue
9
Pages
2211–2225
Publication date
26 March 2026
Language
EN