Inquiry and deception
Abstract
Abstract We all have been deceived, whether by politicians, pundits or peers. Likely more often than we would wish to admit. But what is it to be deceived? As we argue, victims of deception settle on a false answer to a question. This settling proposal not only makes good on the intuitive idea that sceptical agents are harder to deceive than their non-sceptical peers, but also finds support in the infelicity of reporting an agent as both inquiring and deceived. Want to avoid being duped? Our proposal provides an answer: inquire further, don’t settle.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Epistemology
Ethics
and Metaphysics
Free Will and Agency
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Analysis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Publication date
- 16 May 2026
- Language
- EN