Automated segmentation of complicated cystic renal masses using 3D V-Net convolutional neural network on MRI

View at publisher
Authors: Haejin Kang, Chuang Jia, Zhongyi Wang, Bin Huang, He Wang, Jiahui Jiang, Zhe Liu, Mengqiu Cui, Jian Zhao, Xu Bai, Lin Li, Huiping Guo
+6 more Xueyi Ning, Huiyi Ye, Dawei Yang, Hao Guo, Jian Xue, Haiyi Wang
Cited by: 0
References: 39

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a convolutional neural network model for automated segmentation of complicated cystic renal masses (cCRMs) on MRI. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study analysed 210 cCRMs between October 2019 and May 2021, divided into training/internal validation (n = 150, Institution 1) and test sets (n = 60, Institutions 2-4). Comparative 3D V-Net and U-Net models were developed across 7 MRI sequences (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, unenhanced T1-weighted, and enhanced corticomedullary, nephrographic, and excretory phases images). A total of 14 models were developed, and 7 pairwise comparisons were performed between the 3D V-Net and U-Net models. Segmentation performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD), with subgroup analysis of small cCRMs (≤40 mm). RESULTS: In the test set, the excretory-phase V-Net (EPV-Net model) showed the highest DSC, and perform better than the corresponding U-Net (EPU-Net model) across all cCRMs (DSC: 0.74 ± 0.05 vs 0.70 ± 0.06, P < .001; HD: 27.41 ± 7.44 mm vs 39.18 ± 11.07 mm, P < .001) and the 35 small cCRMs subgroup (DSC: 0.74 ± 0.05 vs 0.70 ± 0.06, P < .001; HD: 27.48 mm ± 6.32 vs 38.72 ± 10.69 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D EPV-Net model demonstrated good segmentation accuracy, even for small lesions, supporting its clinical utility for cCRMs evaluation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This automated approach may streamline workflow compared to manual segmentation in cCRMs assessment.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Medical Image Segmentation Techniques Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

Publication details

Journal / source
British Journal of Radiology
Volume
99
Issue
1180
Pages
812–822
Publication date
5 February 2026
Language
EN