Unequal returns to growth and decline across US regions and social classes

View at publisher
Authors: Clayton Adamson
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Economic development theory and practice in the United States implicitly assume that because economic decline is linked to worsened deprivation, the inverse must hold: that growth generates socioeconomic prosperity. While regional economic decline and stagnation correlate with decreasing real income among lower- and middle-income families, income gains from growth accrue primarily to higher-income families. Further, economic and income change relationships are most pronounced in micropolitan and smaller metropolitan regions, questioning the universal applicability of “one-size-fits-all” development strategies. These findings challenge the dominant growth paradigm, emphasising the importance of prioritising equitable resource distribution and place-sensitive strategies in economic development.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Income Poverty and Inequality Economic Growth and Productivity Economic and Technological Innovation

Publication details

Journal / source
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Publication date
11 August 2026
Language
EN