Assessing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction risk in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, the role of comprehensive echocardiographic monitoring

View at publisher
Authors: Daniela Bursacovschi, M Robu, Viorica Ochisor, Georgeta Mihalache, Valeriu Revenco
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is the second leading cause of mortality in cancer patients, with the highest risk observed during the first year after diagnosis [1, 2]. This is also seen in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), where early detection of cardiotoxicity remains a major challenge [3]. Purpose To investigate the potential role of comprehensive echocardiography in the early detection of cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) risk in patients with NHL. Methods A prospective cohort study included 127 patients with NHL, excluding those with other malignancies, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, coronary artery disease, significant valvular heart disease or in NYHA III-IV. Patients were evaluated using a comprehensive echo protocol before the initiation of antitumor treatment and at a 6-months. Parameters measured were LV-Tei index, RV-Tei index, lateral S' velocity of the LV, S' velocity at the RV free wall, TAPSE, LA volume/BSA, E/A ratio, E/e' ratio, and E/Vp ratio. CTRCD was diagnosed according to the 2022 ESC guidelines on Cardio-Oncology. Numerical variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. SHAP analysis and permutation methods were used to validate the contribution of each variable to the prediction of CTRCD. Results CTRCD was confirmed in 18 patients (14.2%) at 6 months. The cohort was divided into Group I (CTRCD) and Group II (no CTRCD), and baseline echo parameters were analyzed. Initial LVEF did not show any statistically significant differences. LV -Tei index and lateral S' velocity of the LV free wall were significantly different in Group I compared to Group II. Specifically, the LV Tei index was 0.3 (IQR=0.2) in Group I vs. 0.1 (IQR=0.1) in Group II (p=0.017), and the LV S’ lateral velocity was 10.0 cm/s (IQR=1.8) in Group I vs. 12.0 cm/s (IQR=3.0) in Group II (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors Cardiac tumors and thrombi

Publication details

Journal / source
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume
27
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN