Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Read full text
Authors: Edjimbi Johann, Nisarg B. Shah, Luca Donisi, Aryan Gajjar, Claudia See, Alyssa Ann Grimshaw, Hassim Bachir Diop, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro, Éloi Marijon, Gari Clifford, Bamba Gaye
Cited by: 1
References: 41

Abstract

Abstract Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is an early precursor to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and it is currently diagnosed using echocardiography, a resource-intensive and operator-dependent modality that limits large-scale screening. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely available but lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy for LVDD. Artificial intelligence (AI)–enhanced ECG analysis has emerged as a potential scalable alternative, although its overall diagnostic performance remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based algorithms for detecting LVDD in a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched eight major databases through August 2025, complemented by forward and backward citation chasing. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of AI-ECG models, using echocardiography as the reference standard, were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. Five studies including 105 554 participants were analysed. AI-ECG demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81–0.83) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70–0.82), with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 98.5% for sensitivity and 99.8% for specificity), although results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Predictive values were prevalence-dependent. Negative predictive value was 98.8% at 5% prevalence and 93.7% at 22.2%, but declined to 81.1% at 50% prevalence and 64.7% at 70%. Artificial intelligence–enhanced electrocardiography demonstrated good diagnostic performance for detecting LVDD and may support future rule-out or risk-enrichment strategies in selected populations. However, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical implementation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors Heart Failure Treatment and Management Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Publication details

Journal / source
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
ztag130–ztag130
Publication date
16 August 2026
Language
EN