Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma Study: A Multi-Centre European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Working Group Evaluating Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes

Read full text
Authors: Olivia Lauk, Bianca Battilana, Ulrike Held, Claudia Lourenço Rodrigues, Martina Haberecker, K. Chiffi, Tom Verbelen, Marc E. de Perrot, Bedrettin Yildizeli, Lanuti Michael, Bernhard Moser, Stefan Schwarz
+3 more Hussein Nasser Awada, René Horsleben Petersen, Isabelle Opitz
Cited by: 1
References: 29

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary artery sarcoma (PAS) is a rare and aggressive malignancy often mimicking pulmonary embolism, leading to diagnostic delays and poor outcomes. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, diagnostic pathways, treatment modalities, and outcomes of PAS patients in a multicentre cohort. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients from 7 institutions between 1994 and 2024. Clinical, radiological, histological, and treatment data were collected via a standardized REDCap-based platform. All patients underwent either multimodal treatment or single therapy approach, including systemic therapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank testing were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 84 patients from 7 international centres were analysed. The mean age was 54.4 years, and 43.8% of patients were female. The most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea (81.2%) and chest pain (50.0%). Pulmonary embolism was the most frequent initial misdiagnosis (49.1%). Histologically, PAS was diagnosed in 46 cases. Tumours were bilateral in 58.1% of patients with surgery only. Most commonly, endarterectomy was performed in 59.5%. After a median follow-up time of 39 months, 19 were excluded as they either had no treatment information or received monotherapy only. Additionally, 11 patients were excluded due to missing date of diagnosis and 17 due to missing overall follow-up date. There was moderate evidence that OS differed between treatment groups (75th quantile: 34 months for multimodal [95% CI, 26 to not reached] vs 11 months for surgery only [95% CI, 7-21]; log-rank P = .022). There was no evidence that PFS differed between treatment groups (median 19 months for multimodal [95% CI, 14-39] vs 16 months surgery only [95% CI, 11-21]; log-rank P = .69). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest reported PAS cohort to date and underscores the diagnostic challenges and poor prognosis associated with this disease. Our findings offer evidence that multimodal treatment provides significant prognostic benefits. However, further prospective studies are warranted to establish standardized diagnostic and therapeutic protocols.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac tumors and thrombi Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Vascular Anomalies and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
68
Issue
6
Publication date
26 March 2026
Language
EN