The problem with the ‘truth’: rethinking ground truth for artificial intelligence in endometriosis diagnosis

Read full text
Authors: Alison Deslandes, Yuan Zhang, Mathew Leonardi, Hsiang‐Ting Chen, Gustavo Carneiro, Jodie Avery, George Condous, Steven Knox, M Louise Hull, the IMAGENDO Team
Cited by: 2
References: 45

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing how we practice medicine. In areas where we have traditionally struggled, such as diagnosing endometriosis, AI has significant potential to improve the breadth and accuracy of diagnostic services offering a great benefit to patient care. When developing AI models for diagnosis, the 'ground truth' refers to the reference standard used in the labelling of the data used to train the model. Conventionally, in clinical medicine, we correlate any new diagnostic tool to the established 'gold standard', which in the case of endometriosis is laparoscopic visualization of lesions and histological confirmation. This method however is increasingly recognized as imperfect. Acknowledgement of the limitations of surgery and recent improvements in the diagnostic capability of imaging technologies to detect endometriosis, has created a situation where endometriosis no longer has one clear 'gold standard' for diagnosis. In this commentary, we will explore the impact of this on AI-driven endometriosis diagnostic tools and propose novel ways this could be addressed in the context of creating ground truths for endometriosis diagnosis.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Endometriosis Research and Treatment Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Human Reproduction
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
650–657
Publication date
5 February 2026
Language
EN