Soluble transferrin receptor as a reliable inflammation-independent marker of iron deficiency in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis

View at publisher
Authors: Francisco Erick de Soura Portela, Paula Ministro, Helena Tavares de Sousa, Joana Roseira, Samuel Fernandes, Ricardo Crespo, Beatriz Domingues, Mafalda Santiago, Rita Melo-Miranda, Sandra Dias, Cláudia Camila Dias, F Magro
Cited by: 1
References: 13

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is a common complication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). However, standard iron markers are influenced by inflammation, complicating the diagnosis of true iron deficiency. Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) has been proposed as a more reliable, inflammation-independent marker of iron demand. This study aimed to assess the utility of sTfR in identifying iron deficiency without anemia (IDWA). METHODS: The ID_IBD study was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Iron status was classified using two approaches: the ECCO consensus definition, focusing on ferritin thresholds adjusted for inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP] and fecal calprotectin [FCAL]), and a stricter definition that adds transferrin saturation to the ECCO criteria. sTfR levels were compared across groups, and ROC curve analysis was used to identify optimal diagnostic cut-offs. RESULTS: This analysis included 411 IBD patients (130 UC, 281 CD) and 178 controls. sTfR showed no correlation with CRP or FCAL. In UC, patients with IDWA had significantly higher sTfR levels (median 1.20 mg/L, IQR 1.02-1.42) compared to non-IDWA patients (median 1.05 mg/L, IQR 0.92-1.22; P = .013). Anemic UC patients also showed elevated sTfR levels (median 1.27 mg/L, IQR 1.14-1.59) compared to non-IDWA individuals (P < .001). In CD, sTfR did not significantly differ between IDWA and non-IDWA patients but was significantly higher in anemic patients (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: sTfR appears to be an inflammation-independent marker of iron status in IBD. It showed greater potential for identifying IDWA in UC, while in CD it mainly reflected increased iron demand in anemia. Overall, sTfR may be useful as a complementary parameter to conventional iron markers. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess their clinical utility in IBD.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Iron Metabolism and Disorders Inflammatory Bowel Disease Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Publication details

Journal / source
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1321–1332
Publication date
26 March 2026
Language
EN