Correction to: Dissecting the contributions of organic nitrogen aerosols to global atmospheric nitrogen deposition and implications for ecosystems

Read full text
Authors: Yumin Li, Tzung‐May Fu, Jian Zhen Yu, Xu Yu, Qi Chen, Ruqian Miao, Yang Zhou, Aoxing Zhang, Jianhuai Ye, Xin Yang, Shu Tao, Hongbin Liu
+1 more Weiqi Yao
Cited by: 0

Abstract

In the article by Li et al., ‘Dissecting the contributions of organic nitrogen aerosols to global atmospheric nitrogen deposition and implications for ecosystems’, National Science Review 2023; 10: nwad244, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad244, errors were identified concerning Fig. 4G, Table 1 and the corresponding values in the text. The specific corrections are as follows: Global atmospheric burden of ON: Our original calculation did not properly account for the vertical variation of air density, leading to an overestimation of the ON burden (Column 2 in Table 1). We correct by using the correct air density profile. Imine secondary organic nitrogen (SON) formation: In the original version, we calculated imine SON formation assuming constant reactant abundance. We update this calculation by using pseudo-first-order rate constants, where ammonium (NH₄⁺) is assumed constant, while glyoxal and methylglyoxal decrease over timesteps. Simulated annual mean atmospheric deposition fluxes of ONp from different sources. (A) anthropogenic PONp; (B) biomass burning PONp; (C) fine dust PONp; (D) fine marine PONp; (E) fine biogenic PONp; (F) ship-emitted PONp; (G) imine SONp; (H) organic nitrate SONp; (I) nitroaromatic SONp; (J) coarse dust PONp; (K) coarse marine PONp; (L) coarse biogenic PONp. Global budget of atmospheric ON and the ON : TN ratios in atmospheric deposition as simulated by the GEOS-Chem model. Global budget of atmospheric ON and the ON : TN ratios in atmospheric deposition as simulated by the GEOS-Chem model. The corrected Table 1 and corresponding text are presented below. Corrections involve the values of atmospheric burden (second column from left in Table 1, and those in the main text; both highlighted in bold). Table 1 summarizes the global budget of atmospheric ON as simulated by our model. The total atmospheric burden of ON was 0.4 Tg N (range in sensitivity experiments was 0.26 Tg N to 0.56 Tg N), including 0.2 Tg N of ONg and 0.2 Tg N of ONp. ONg species were mostly chemically produced in the atmosphere as acyl peroxy nitrates (e.g. peroxyacetyl nitrate) and non-acyl peroxy nitrates (e.g. methyl peroxy nitrate), and all ONg species had limited solubility [2]. As such, ONg were mainly removed from the atmosphere by thermal decomposition, photolysis or OH oxidation [26,60], with deposition accounting for a mere 1% to 2% of its global sink [61]. Globally, ONg only constituted 9% of the total atmospheric ON deposition. In contrast, ONp constituted only 50% of the global atmospheric ON burden but dominated the global atmospheric ON deposition (91%). Of the 0.2 Tg N global atmospheric ONp burden, 87% (0.18 Tg N) was in the fine mode (ONfp). ONcp constituted only 13% (0.03 Tg N) of the global ONp burden because of its rapid deposition. The corrected Fig. 4 is presented below. There is a slight difference in Fig. 4G while the other sub-figures remain unchanged. The publicly accessible model code has been updated at the original repository link: https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.o00005.00024 We apologize for any inconvenience caused. These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the article.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols Atmospheric aerosols and clouds Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Publication details

Journal / source
National Science Review
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
nwaf538–nwaf538
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN