245. Using Probability of Community-Acquired Pneumonia to Tailor Antimicrobials Among Inpatients (UP-CAPTAIN): A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating the Impact of Guided Test Interpretation on Antibiotic Use among Patients with Suspected Community-Acquired Respiratory Infection

Read full text
Authors: Jonathan D. Baghdadi, A. Wellesley Harris, Lisa L. Pineles, Shatha Alshanqeeti, Danica Palacio, Drew W. Charles, Emily L. Heil, Kimberly C. Claeys, Jacqueline T. Bork, Melinda M. Neuhauser, Sarah Kabbani, Sarah K. Sommerkamp
+4 more Richard Gentry Wilkerson, Mark Sutherland, Jennifer Kristie Johnson, D. Morgan
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Respiratory illness is the most common reason for unnecessary antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults. Although procalcitonin and respiratory virus testing help differentiate between viral and bacterial illness, they tend not to influence antibiotic decision-making.Figure 1.Testing Wisely Disease Risk Calculator for Bacterial PneumoniaFigure 2.Example of Templated Note for a Patient with Low Post-test Probability of Bacterial Pneumonia Methods We conducted a pragmatic randomized-controlled trial comparing antimicrobial stewardship-guided test interpretation versus usual care among hospitalized adults receiving antibiotics for suspected respiratory infection with either low serum procalcitonin or positive respiratory virus testing at 2 hospitals (NCT05976581). The intervention involved chart review to estimate post-test probability of bacterial pneumonia based on either the low procalcitonin or positive respiratory viral panel and available imaging using an online calculator (Figure 1). Post-test probability was then documented in a note in the patient’s chart along with templated recommendations (Figure 2). When post-test probability was low, antibiotics were recommended to be discontinued. When post-test probability was medium or high, recommendations focused on tailoring antibiotics and setting an appropriate duration of therapy. An electronic message referring to the note and summarizing recommendations was also sent to the clinical team. Results Between 11/1/2023 and 1/10/2025, 107 adult inpatients were randomized, including 54 to the intervention and 53 to usual care (Table 1). Thirty percent of enrolled patients had a low serum procalcitonin, and 70% had a positive respiratory virus panel. The intervention significantly decreased antibiotic use (median hospital days of antibiotic therapy 7.5 versus 11, p = 0.005, Table 2) and increased discontinuation of all respiratory antibiotics within 5 days of initiation (76% versus 49%, p = 0.004). Clinical outcomes, including length of stay (5.5d with intervention versus 6.6d with usual care, p = 0.16) and 30-day readmission (7% with intervention versus 19% with usual care, p = 0.079), were equivalent between groups. Conclusion Guided interpretation of standard diagnostic tests for viral infection substantially reduced unnecessary antibiotic use for hospitalized adults with community-acquired respiratory illness. Disclosures Anthony Harris, MD, MPH, UpToDate Wolters Kluwer Health: Infection control section editor Emily L. Heil, PharmD, MS, Wolters-Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant

Fields of Study & Subjects

Antibiotic Use and Resistance Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections Healthcare cost quality practices

Publication details

Journal / source
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume
13
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN