P-1346. Comparative Effectiveness of Parenteral Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin Among Patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Endogenous endophthalmitis: A Retrospective Analysis

Read full text
Authors: Silvana Ellen Ribeiro Papp, Zinaida Perciuleac, Paddy Ssentongo, Siddartha Guru, Alex Jakubiak, Sulochana Khadka, Poonam Bai, Anas Atrash
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Endogenous endophthalmitis is a rare complication of Staphylococcus aureus, including its methicillin-resistant (MRSA), presents a significant clinical challenge due to its potential for irreversible vision. Vancomycin and daptomycin are commonly used systemic and intravitreal antibiotics; however, their comparative effectiveness in treating MRSA endogenous endophthalmitis remains unclear. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus vancomycin in MRSA bacteremia with endophthalmitis.Figure 1:MortalityIn this matched cohort analysis of 200 patients with MRSA endophthalmitis (100 treated with daptomycin, 100 with vancomycin), mortality rates were similar—10% for daptomycin vs. 12% for vancomycin (risk difference -0.020; 95% CI: -0.107, 0.067; p = 0.651).Figure 2:CPK levelsCPK elevation, indicating muscle toxicity, was much higher with daptomycin (52.9% vs. 13.0%; risk difference 0.400; 95% CI: 0.243, 0.556; p < 0.0001) Methods A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Research Collaborative Network. Adults diagnosed with MRSA endophthalmitis were included into daptomycin and vancomycin treatment groups. Propensity score matching was performed to balance covariates between groups. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazard regression, and log-rank tests. Results In this matched cohort analysis of 200 patients with MRSA endophthalmitis (100 treated with daptomycin, 100 with vancomycin), mortality rates were similar—10% for daptomycin vs. 12% for vancomycin (risk difference -0.020; 95% CI: -0.107, 0.067; p = 0.651), as were rates of blindness (13.9% vs. 13.5%; risk difference 0.004; 95% CI: -0.108, 0.115; p = 0.947), endocarditis (11.6% vs. 11.4%; risk difference 0.003; 95% CI: -0.092, 0.097; p = 0.956). Septic shock (27.0% vs. 18.5%) and bacteremia were more frequent with daptomycin, but not significantly. CPK elevation was higher in daptomycin (52.9% vs. 13.0%; risk difference 0.400; 95% CI: 0.243, 0.556; p < 0.0001), and CKD stage 4/5 occurred in 12.2% of daptomycin patients versus 0% for vancomycin (risk difference 0.122; 95% CI: 0.051, 0.193; p = 0.001). Notably, embolic stroke occurred in 0% of daptomycin patients compared to 10.4% vancomycin (risk difference -0.104; 95% CI: -0.165, -0.043; p = 0.001). Baseline characteristics were well-matched, including mean age (53.5 vs. 54 years), diabetes (55% vs. 45%), and mean BMI (29.2 vs. 28.3). Conclusion Daptomycin and vancomycin provide comparable effectiveness for major clinical outcomes in MRSA endophthalmitis, but their safety profiles differ. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ocular Infections and Treatments Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

Publication details

Journal / source
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume
13
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN