P-1353. Earlier Cefiderocol Use was Associated with Better Outcomes for Challenging Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: US Results From the Global Observational PROVE Study

Read full text
Authors: Cornelius Joseph Clancy, A M Lachiewicz, Stefano Verardi, Karan Gill, Anne Santerre Henriksen, Sean T Nguyen
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The PROVE study enrolled 508 patients in the USA with serious Gram-negative bacterial infections treated with cefiderocol in routine clinical practice. The clinical outcomes of this subset of patients were assessed. Methods PROVE was an international, retrospective, observational medical chart review study (November 2020–July 2024). Data were analyzed from hospitalized US patients with confirmed Gram-negative bacterial infections, who received cefiderocol for the first time for ≥72 hours. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, cefiderocol use, clinical response, clinical cure, and all-cause mortality (ACM) were assessed. Results Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of patients was 58 (44–67) years and 61.2% were men (Table 1). The three most frequent concomitant conditions were diabetes mellitus (36.0%), chronic pulmonary disease (25.0%), and sepsis/septic shock (23.2%). Cefiderocol was given for a median (IQR) of 10 (7–16) days and as combination therapy in 33.1% of patients. At cefiderocol initiation, 57.3% of patients were in the intensive care unit and 47.6% were receiving organ support. Most patients (93.3%) had ≥1 risk factor for acquiring carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria. Respiratory tract infection (RTI) was the most common infection (n=272; 53.5%), followed by skin and skin structure infection (n=74; 14.6%) (Table 2). Overall rates of clinical cure, clinical response, and 30-day ACM were 70.1%, 77.8%, and 20.7%, respectively. Among patients with RTIs, clinical cure and 30-day ACM rates were 64.7% and 25.7%, respectively. Clinical cure rates were 73.7% (95% CI: 62.3–85.1%) when cefiderocol was used empirically and 72.3% (95% CI: 67.7–76.8%) when used for documented infections, whereas clinical cure rate was 54.3% (95% CI: 42.6–66.0%) when used as salvage therapy. Clinical cure rates for patients with Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were 79.3% and 70.4%, with respective 30-day ACM rates of 17.2% and 20.4%. Conclusion US patients at risk for acquiring CR infections receiving cefiderocol as salvage therapy had a lower clinical cure rate than those treated empirically or for documented infections; thus, earlier cefiderocol treatment prior to clinical decline may be beneficial for such patients. Disclosures Cornelius J. Clancy, MD, Merck: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Anne Lachiewicz, MD, MPH, Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Stefano Verardi, MD, Shionogi BV: Employee Karan Gill, Master of Science, Shionogi BV: Employee Anne Santerre Henriksen, PHD, Shionogi BV: Advisor/Consultant Sean T. Nguyen, PharmD, Shionogi Inc: Employee

Fields of Study & Subjects

Nosocomial Infections in ICU Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Publication details

Journal / source
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
13
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN