P-2129. Prolonged infusion of β-lactams for Enterobacterales bacteremia in high-risk neutropenic patients: Does it improve outcomes?

Read full text
Authors: Fabián Herrera, Diego Torres, Lucas Tula, Noelia Mañez, María Laura Pereyra, Lorena A. Berruezo, José Daniel Benso, Ana Laborde, Nadia Suchowiercha, A Nenna, Jorge López Camelo, Rocío Gago
+17 more Nadia Ailen Fernández, Verónica Fernández, María Luz González Ibañez, Inés Roccia Rossi, Vanesa Soto, Natalin Grippo, Miriam Blanco, Mariángeles Visús, Natalia Azula, Ruth Carbone, Magdalena Pennini, Mariana Reynaldi, María Laura Chaves, Fernando G. Pasterán, Alejandra C. Corso, Melina Rapoport, Alberto Ángel Carena
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background No evidences have been reported on the clinical benefits of prolonged infusion (PI) of β-lactams in febrile neutropenic patients (FNP) with Enterobacterales bacteremia (EB). Methods A prospective observational multicenter study was conducted in 9 referral academic centers in Argentina between February 2019 and December 2024. The first episodes of EB in high-risk FNP who received appropriate empirical treatment (AET) with piperacillin-tazobactam (PT), cefepime (C), or meropenem (M) were included. Clinical, epidemiological, and outcome variables were compared in patients receiving either standard infusion (SI) or PI AET. A propensity score (PS) to balance baseline covariates was used. Adjusted conditional multivariate logistic regression analysis to PS was used to identify independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Results 201 patients were included (116 SI and 85 PI). Median age was 49 years (IQR: 35-63), and the most common underlying diseases were acute leukemia (61.69%) and lymphoma (18.91%). The microorganisms most frequently observed in both groups were E. coli (58.71%) and Klebsiella spp. (32.84%). Bacteremia presented with a clinical source in 58.82% of PI cases vs. 55.17% of SI cases, p = 0.60. Hypotension and shock were present in PI vs. SI in 28.4% vs. 25%, p=0.60, and 17.65% vs. 14.66%, p=0.56, respectively. Intensive care unit admission and multiorgan failure occurred in PI vs. SI: 18.82% vs. 12.07%, p = 0.56, and 16.47% vs. 11.21%, p = 0.28, respectively. Seven-day clinical response between IP and IB was 90.59% vs. 93.10%, p = 0.51. Thirty-day overall mortality and EB-related mortality were 14.12% vs. 10.34% (p = 0.41) and 8.24% vs. 3.45% (p = 0.20) for PI and SI, respectively. Septic shock was the risk factor associated with 30-day mortality (OR: 11.65, 95% CI, 3.66-36.91, p < 0.001), while 7-day clinical response was a protective factor for survival (OR: 0.06, 95% CI, 0.01-0.24, p < 0.001). PI did not correlate with impact on mortality (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 0.54-5.79, p = 0.34). Conclusion In our high-risk FNP cohort with EB, AET with PI did not improve outcomes. However, randomized trials are needed to confirm the study findings. Disclosures Alberto Carena, n/a, Roche Diagnostics: Medical affairs lead

Fields of Study & Subjects

Neutropenia and Cancer Infections Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Publication details

Journal / source
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume
13
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN