Characterization and clinical management of adverse events following treatment with repotrectinib: a TRIDENT-1 analysis

Read full text
Authors: Alexander E. Drilon, Byoung Chul Cho, D Ross Camidge, Misako Nagasaka, Benjamin Besse, B Solomon, Koichi Goto, Jürgen Wolf, Sanjay Popat, Enriqueta Felip, Nong Yang, A. de Langen
+9 more Shun Lu, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Andrew L. Lin, Christophe Yannick Calvet, Li Li, Marina Tschaika, Salman Afsar, Haisu Yang, Jessica J. Lin
Cited by: 1
References: 22

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1/TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Its side effects and safety management strategies require further characterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The safety profile of repotrectinib (treatment-emergent/related adverse events [TEAEs/TRAEs]) was established in patients who initiated treatment at the recommended dose (160 mg daily [QD] for 14 days, then 160 mg twice daily [BID]) across all cohorts of the global, multicenter phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 study. AE management strategies were outlined. RESULTS: In 472 patients, the most common TRAEs (dizziness [58%] and dysgeusia [50%]) were likely TRK inhibition-related. Median relative dose intensity was 90%; 14% (n = 66/472) of patients did not increase their initial QD dose to BID (mostly due to CNS AEs). Rates of dizziness (median onset, 7 days) were similar in patients with/without baseline brain metastases. Dose modifications downgraded severity or resolved dizziness in 78% of patients; 58% of patients had pharmacologic intervention without dose modification. Dizziness was downgraded/resolved in 62% (n = 120/195) of patients who did not receive dose modification or pharmacologic intervention. Treatment-related cognitive impairment and weight gain occurred in 19% and 12% of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent withdrawal pain occurred in 14% of patients (median resolution time, 2.1 weeks). Dose interruption and reduction from TRAEs occurred in 39% and 38% of patients, respectively; 10% reported later re-escalation back to 160 mg BID. CONCLUSION: Many repotrectinib AEs, including neurological AEs secondary to TRK inhibition, were mitigated with appropriate management, including dose modification and/or pharmacologic intervention.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Melanoma and MAPK Pathways Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
The Oncologist
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
31
Issue
6
Publication date
14 April 2026
Language
EN