We the Peoples of the United Nations

View at publisher
Authors: Samantha Besson
Cited by: 3
References: 10

Abstract

Abstract The democratic deficit of international organizations (IOs) partly resides in the lack of constituent authorship of the people subject to their law. A key point in proposals for the reform of IOs pertains to the re-institution of their instituent peoples into instituted publics. Most proposals suffer from two blind spots, however. First of all, they situate the instituent powers of IOs ‘beyond the state’ as if IOs’ Member States’ peoples and publics were not themselves re-instituted at the same time. Second, they overlook the representative, and hence re-institutive, dimension of the participation of multiple civil society organizations in IOs. In so doing, they neglect not only the potential of ‘multi-public’ representation in and by IOs but also the compensatory role of civil representation therein. The proposal to reorganize IOs as ‘multipartite’ representation system is illustrated in two UN specialized agencies: the International Labour Organization and the World Health Organization.

Fields of Study & Subjects

International Labor and Employment Law Human Rights and Development Discrimination and Equality Law

Publication details

Journal / source
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Pages
531–544
Publication date
24 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book chapter