Misinformation, Freedom of Expression and Mandatory Vaccination

Read full text
Authors: Steven R. Kraaijeveld
Cited by: 1
References: 14

Abstract

(2024), Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij develop an account of collective immunization according to which liberal-democratic governments are sometimes justified in restricting people's freedom to refuse vaccination. In this commentary, I focus on a specific argument in the book about misinformation, freedom of expression and mandatory vaccination. Pierik and Verweij argue that, when vaccine misinformation threatens vaccination rates, governments-in order to increase or maintain vaccination rates-should consider mandatory vaccination before restricting freedom of expression. I summarize the argument and raise two issues to help advance the debate.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Misinformation and Its Impacts Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Publication details

Journal / source
Public Health Ethics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
phag013–phag013
Publication date
26 March 2026
Language
EN